Ruth Martin v. Outdoor Network LLC
Ruth Martin |
Outdoor Network, LLC and Outdoor Network LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Boats.net |
2:2023cv09807 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
A Joel Richlin |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Plaintiff's Complaint) #10 filed by Plaintiff Ruth Martin. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 1 to RJN, #3 Exhibit 2 to RJN, #4 Exhibit 3 to RJN, #5 Exhibit 4 to RJN, #6 Exhibit 5 to RJN, #7 Exhibit 6 to RJN, #8 Exhibit 7 to RJN, #9 Exhibit 8 to RJN, #10 Declaration of S. Ferrell, #11 Exhibit 1 to Dec of S. Ferrell, #12 Exhibit 2 to Dec of S. Ferrell, #13 Exhibit 3 to Dec of S. Ferrell, #14 Declaration of R. Martin)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 3/1/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Plaintiff's Complaint) filed by Defendant Outdoor Network, LLC Outdoor Network LLC. Motion set for hearing on 2/2/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jason Rindge ISO MTD Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Declaration of Alexander Robinson ISO Network's MTD, #3 Proposed Order) (Robinson, Alexander) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court APPROVES the parties' Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint #8 and ORDERS that Defendant has until 12/27/2023, to respond to the Complaint. (gk) |
Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Outdoor Network LLC answer now due 12/27/2023, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Outdoor Network LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinson, Alexander) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (sh) |
NONCONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendant Outdoor Network LLC, filed by Plaintiff Ruth Martin [STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Outdoor Network LLC., filed by Plaintiff Ruth Martin.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/15/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Outdoor Network, LLC, (Robinson, Alexander) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Outdoor Network, LLC. (Robinson, Alexander) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV19530 Receipt No: ACACDC-36432332 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Outdoor Network, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jason Rindge in Support of Notice of Removal to Federal Court, #2 Declaration of Alexander E. Robinson in Support of Notice of Removal to Federal Court) (Attorney Alexander Edwin Robinson added to party Outdoor Network, LLC(pty:dft))(Robinson, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.