Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
| Deckers Outdoor Corporation |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE COPORATION, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Costco Wholesale Corporation |
| 2:2023cv09855 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| George H Wu |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen re #14 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order (tsn)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS FOR GOOD CAUSE #13 by Judge George H Wu. Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint is extended up through and including February 16, 2024. (rolm)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Costco Wholesale Corporation answer now due 2/16/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Costco Wholesale Corporation answer now due 1/17/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation.(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation, upon Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation served on 11/27/2023, answer due 12/18/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gastelum, Process Specialist Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 10 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Senior District Judge George H Wu. (lom) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation, identifying Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36439375 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Jamie Fountain added to party Deckers Outdoor Corporation(pty:pla))(Fountain, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
