Emily Tidball et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
| Emily Tidball and Rodney Tidball |
| Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc |
| 2:2023cv09862 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John Christopher Elliott. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jere Kyle Bachus. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Darin Lee Schanker. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Andrew Thomas Kagan. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 18 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 2:17-cv-07456, from U.S. District Court Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans. The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:23-cv-09862 FLA (PVCx). (jtil) |
| Filing 14 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Louisiana Eastern |
|
Filing 13
TRANSFER ORDER - Case transferred to Central District of California. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 10/23/2023. (MDL 2740, Doc. 16511) (sa) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.]
|
| Filing 12 Joint Designation of Record for MDL Transfer by Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. JOINT DESIGNATION OF GENERAL AND CASE-SPECIFIC MDL RECORDS TO BE INCLUDED UPON REMAND (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Ratliff, Harley) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo. Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance.(ADI) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.]
|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (cc) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 9 Request of Summons Issued as to Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC filed by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint,. (Kagan, Andrew) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
|
Filing 8
PRETRIAL ORDERS. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt.(ADI) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.]
|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (cc) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 6 Request of Summons Issued as to Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. filed by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint,. (Kagan, Andrew) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 5 Request of Summons Issued as to Sanofi S.A. filed by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint,. (Kagan, Andrew) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 4 Request of Summons Issued as to Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC filed by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint,. (Kagan, Andrew) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 3 Request of Summons Issued as to Aventis Pharma S.A. filed by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint,. (Kagan, Andrew) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (jeg) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-6291922) filed by Emily Tidball, Rodney Tidball. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Andrew Thomas Kagan added to party Emily Tidball(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Thomas Kagan added to party Rodney Tidball(pty:pla).(Kagan, Andrew) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 11/22/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
