Tyler Wilson v. City of Hawthorne et al
Plaintiff: TYLER WILSON
Defendant: City of Hawthorne and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv09986
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2024 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of Hawthorne.(Sakai, Raymond)
December 22, 2023 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Hawthorne answer now due 1/25/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by DEFENDANT City of Hawthorne.(Attorney Raymond W Sakai added to party City of Hawthorne (pty:dft))(Sakai, Raymond)
December 6, 2023 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tyler Wilson, upon Defendant City of Hawthorne served on 12/4/2023, answer due 12/26/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diane Cucalon/ Deputy City Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Dunn, Brian)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
November 29, 2023 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant City of Hawthorne. (et)
November 29, 2023 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
November 29, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
November 29, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
November 27, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff TYLER WILSON. (Dunn, Brian)
November 27, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF TYLER WILSON, identifying Tyler Wilson, Brian Dunn and the City of Hawthorne. (Dunn, Brian)
November 27, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff TYLER WILSON. (Dunn, Brian)
November 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36469139 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff TYLER WILSON. (Attorney Brian T Dunn added to party TYLER WILSON(pty:pla))(Dunn, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tyler Wilson v. City of Hawthorne et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYLER WILSON
Represented By: Brian T Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hawthorne
Represented By: Hrach Eric Agazaryan
Represented By: Paul B Beach
Represented By: Raymond W Sakai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?