Erica Chavez v. GameStop, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Erica Chavez
Defendant: GameStop, Inc., GameStop Corp. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv09990
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Scheduling Conference set for 2/15/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (dbe)
December 12, 2023 Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: This matter has been assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's website under Judge Frimpong's Procedures and Schedules. Please read the Standing Order carefully. It is the responsibilities of the parties to maintain familiarly with the Standing Order and any future amendments that the Court may issue by periodically checking the Court's website for the operative version of the Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 4, 2023 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc., served on 12/04/2023. (Smith, Paul)
December 4, 2023 Filing 12 Notice of Compliance with 28 USC 1446(d) filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Smith, Paul)
November 28, 2023 Filing 11 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
November 28, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
November 28, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh)
November 27, 2023 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
November 27, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Erica Chavez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/15/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
November 27, 2023 Filing 8 DECLARATION of Mark H. Robinson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 7 DECLARATION of Heather Toro re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Ariel Kumpinsky re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-A, #2 Exhibit 1-B)(Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc. (Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc. (Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Smith, Paul)
November 27, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV22392 Receipt No: ACACDC-36470485 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant GameStop Corp., GameStop, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Other Case Initiating Documents, #3 Exhibit C - Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Paul M Smith added to party GameStop Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Paul M Smith added to party GameStop, Inc.(pty:dft))(Smith, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erica Chavez v. GameStop, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erica Chavez
Represented By: Justin F Marquez
Represented By: Christina Marie Le
Represented By: Zachary David Greenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GameStop, Inc.
Represented By: Paul M Smith
Represented By: Alexandra M Asterlin
Represented By: Michael J Nader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GameStop Corp.
Represented By: Paul M Smith
Represented By: Alexandra M Asterlin
Represented By: Michael J Nader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?