Jeremy Martin Haar v. United States of America
Jeremy Martin Haar |
United States of America |
2:2023cv10056 |
November 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Letter requesting extension of time #10 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The document is accepted as filed. (tj) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Letter #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.5 no letters to the Judge. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (yl) |
Filing 10 Letter from Jeremy Haar. (yl) |
Filing 8 SEALED - EXHIBIT A (bm) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION REQUESTING COURT ORDER (1) FINDING WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS; AND (2) IMPLEMENTING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR SUCH COMMUNICATIONS (NO. CV 23-10056 DKT. #5 ; NO. CR 20-00409 DKT. 71 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The information disclosed in the Robinson Declaration attached to the Application will be considered confidential information and, absent further Court order, will not be disclosed by the USAO to any other law enforcement or prosecuting agency except as necessary to assist in the USAOs litigation of the ineffective assistance of counsel claim presented in the Motion; The information disclosed in the Robinson Declaration will be used by the USAO only for the purpose of litigating the claims presented in the Motion; The USAO will provide a copy of the Court's order to any individual who is provided access to the information disclosed in the Robinson Declaration. The protections of the protective order shall remain in place even after litigation of Petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is completed; and Notwithstanding these limitations, the parties are permitted to refer to information disclosed in response to the Robinson Declaration, and are not required to file such briefing under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: the request to file Exhibit A to the Application, the Robinson Declaration, under seal is GRANTED. The Government shall file the Robinson Declaration under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) |
Filing 9 Letter received from Petitioner Jeremy Haar (bm) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 USC Section 2255 filed by Respondent United States of America. (Butler, Kevin) |
Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for FINDING WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS; and (2) IMPLEMENTING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR SUCH COMMUNICATIONS filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Kevin James Butler added to party United States of America(pty:res)) (Butler, Kevin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Respondent United States of America of Exhhibit. (Butler, Kevin) |
Filing 3 ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C 2255 (DKT. #1 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. On November 27, 2023, Petitioner Jeremy Martin Haar filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C 2255. The Government shall file any response to the Motion on or before December 28, 2023. Any response shall not exceed 15 pages. Petitioner shall file any reply to the Government's response on or before the earlier of (i) 14 days after the Government's response is filed or (ii) January 11, 2024. Any reply filed by Petitioner shall not exceed 10 pages. Upon the completion of the briefing on the Motion, the Motion shall be taken under submission and decided without a hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt for motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (car) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt. For docketing entries refer to CR Case # 2:20-cr-00409-JAK-1, filed by Petitioner Jeremy Martin Haar. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jeremy Martin Haar v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jeremy Martin Haar | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR |
Represented By: | Kevin James Butler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.