173D Airborne Brigade Association v. Caleb Geller et al
173D AIRBORNE BRIGADE ASSOCIATION |
CALEB GELLER, MICHAEL GELLER, Adamo Callei, Adamo Rossouw, Jay McAsher and Does 1-100 |
2:2023cv10076 |
November 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael R Wilner |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Caleb Geller answer now due 2/2/2024; Michael Geller answer now due 2/2/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff 173D Airborne Brigade Association.(Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Paul Philip Strickland on behalf of Defendants Caleb Geller, Michael Geller (Attorney Paul Philip Strickland added to party Caleb Geller(pty:dft), Attorney Paul Philip Strickland added to party Michael Geller(pty:dft))(Strickland, Paul) |
Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days),, #9 filed by Plaintiff 173D Airborne Brigade Association. (Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff 173D Airborne Brigade Association, upon Defendant Michael Geller served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chris Watkin, who identified themselves as a co-resident of Defendant and was over the age of 18 in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Mailing Following Substituted Service)(Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff 173D Airborne Brigade Association, upon Defendant Caleb Geller served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chris Watkin, who identified themselves as a co-resident of Defendant and was over the age of 18 in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Mailing Following Substituted Service)(Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT Regarding Status Of Service Pursuant to the Court's December 19, 2023 Order (DKT. 7)023 filed by Plaintiff 173D Airborne Brigade Association re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #7 . (Mow, Margarette) |
![]() |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Caleb Geller, Michael Geller. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff 173D AIRBORNE BRIGADE ASSOCIATION, identifying NONE. (Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff 173D AIRBORNE BRIGADE ASSOCIATION. (Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff 173D AIRBORNE BRIGADE ASSOCIATION. (Mow, Margarette) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36490549 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff 173D AIRBORNE BRIGADE ASSOCIATION. (Attorney Margarette M Mow added to party 173D AIRBORNE BRIGADE ASSOCIATION (pty:pla))(Mow, Margarette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.