Patricia Salazar et al v. Floyds 99 Holdings LLC et al
Plaintiff: Patricia Salazar, Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association and Minimally Invasive Surgical Association
Defendant: Floyds 99 Holdings, LLC, Floyds 99 Holdings LLC and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2023cv10153
Filed: December 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
December 18, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-10153-ODW (JCx). (et)
December 8, 2023 Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: This action has been assigned to the civil consent calendar of Judge Steve Kim through the Voluntary Consent Program or the Magistrate Judges Direct Assignment Program. This standing order is automatically vacated if any party declines to consent in a case assigned to the court under the Magistrate Judges Direct Assignment Program. There are no adverse substantive consequences for declining consent. (et)
December 4, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh)
December 4, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh)
December 1, 2023 CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Floyds 99 Holdings LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Minimally Invasive Surgical Association, Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association, Patricia Salazar. [FILED IN STATE COURT 10/03/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
December 1, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Floyds 99 Holdings, LLC. (Sullivan, Donald)
December 1, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 23stcv24031 Receipt No: ACACDC-36504440 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Floyds 99 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons) (Attorney Donald P Sullivan added to party Floyds 99 Holdings, LLC(pty:dft))(Sullivan, Donald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patricia Salazar et al v. Floyds 99 Holdings LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Salazar
Represented By: Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association
Represented By: Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minimally Invasive Surgical Association
Represented By: Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Floyds 99 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Donald P Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Floyds 99 Holdings LLC
Represented By: Donald P Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?