Yuri Doering v. Mariscos Mi Lindo Sinaloa, Inc. et al
| Yuri Doering |
| Mariscos Mi Lindo Sinaloa, Inc. doing business as Mariscos Mi Lindo Sinaloa and Sports Bar, Vien Tran and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv10219 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's causes of action for alleged violations of the Unruh Act, California Disabled Persons Act, and California Health and Safety Code and cause of action for negligence are DISMISSED; provided, however, this Order is stayed for 21 days following its entry so that Plaintiff may refile these state law claims in an appropriate Superior Court while they remain pending here. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doeringto Order to Show Cause,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE-LAW CLAIMS by Judge John A. Kronstadt. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause, not to exceed ten pages, on or before December 20, 2023. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause, not to exceed ten pages, on or before December 20, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Mariscos Mi Lindo Sinaloa, Inc., Vien Tran. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yuri Doering. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36518637 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Yuri Doering(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
