PFN Lending Group, Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
| PFN Lending Group, Inc. |
| Aspen Specialty Insurance Company |
| 2:2023cv10226 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Karen E Scott |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff PFN Lending Group, Inc.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Crosner, Shaun) |
Filing 11
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/22/2024. Re Answer/Default of Aspen Specialty Ins. Co. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff PFN Lending Group, Inc., upon Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company served on 12/13/2023, answer due 1/3/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Aspen Specialty Insurance Company c/o Paul Hernandez, Employee, Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Crosner, Shaun) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff PFN Lending Group, Inc., identifying PFN LENDING GROUP, INC., and ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Crosner, Shaun) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff PFN Lending Group, Inc.. (Crosner, Shaun) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff PFN Lending Group, Inc.. (Crosner, Shaun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36521421 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff PFN Lending Group, Inc.. (Attorney Shaun Hamilton Crosner added to party PFN Lending Group, Inc.(pty:pla))(Crosner, Shaun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PFN Lending Group, Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PFN Lending Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daria Clecicov |
| Represented By: | Shaun Hamilton Crosner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
