Deborah Mitchell et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Deborah Mitchell and Dallas McIntosh
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, Brandon Thomas, Miguel Rodas and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv10276
Filed: December 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2024 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Deborah Mitchell, Dallas McIntosh, upon Defendant Miguel Rodas served on 1/15/2024, answer due 2/5/2024. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Peacock, Gregory)
January 25, 2024 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Deborah Mitchell, Dallas McIntosh, upon Defendant Brandon Thomas served on 1/15/2024, answer due 2/5/2024. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Peacock, Gregory)
January 25, 2024 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Deborah Mitchell, Dallas McIntosh, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 1/16/2024, answer due 2/6/2024. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Peacock, Gregory)
December 18, 2023 Filing 11 Summons Issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants City of Los Angeles, Miguel Rodas, and Brandon Thomas. (yl)
December 15, 2023 Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Dallas McIntosh, Deborah Mitchell. (Peacock, Gregory)
December 8, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #5 . The following error(s) was found: The Summons cannot be issued against a Plaintiff. On the "To Defendant's line of the Summons one of the names is Dallas McIntosh who is a Plaintiff in this civil case. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car)
December 8, 2023 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
December 8, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
December 8, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car)
December 7, 2023 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Dallas McIntosh, Deborah Mitchell. (Peacock, Gregory)
December 7, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying City of Los Angeles, Brandon Thomas and Miguel Rodas. (Peacock, Gregory)
December 7, 2023 Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiffs Dallas McIntosh, Deborah Mitchell.. (Peacock, Gregory)
December 7, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Dallas McIntosh, Deborah Mitchell. (Peacock, Gregory)
December 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36532098 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Deborah Mitchell, Dallas McIntosh. (Attorney Gregory Paul Peacock added to party Dallas McIntosh(pty:pla), Attorney Gregory Paul Peacock added to party Deborah Mitchell(pty:pla))(Peacock, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deborah Mitchell et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Mitchell
Represented By: Gregory Paul Peacock
Represented By: Andrew M. Stein
Represented By: Joseph A. Markus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dallas McIntosh
Represented By: Gregory Paul Peacock
Represented By: Andrew M. Stein
Represented By: Joseph A. Markus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel Rodas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?