Juan Valencia v. Tap Worldwide, LLC et al
Juan Valencia |
Tap Worldwide, LLC doing business as 4 Wheel Parts, Oaks Auto Center, LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2023cv10291 |
December 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Dean D Pregerson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Juan Valencia, upon Defendant Oaks Auto Center, LLC served on 1/13/2024, answer due 2/5/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon RON S. BERG, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Tap Worldwide, LLC.(Attorney Brendan Holland Browne added to party Tap Worldwide, LLC(pty:dft))(Browne, Brendan) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central Districts website at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov for Judge Dean D.Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing a motion. Counsel are required to comply with C.D. Cal. L.R. 5-4.4.1 through 5-4.4.2. See order for more information. (shb) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Juan Valencia, upon Defendant Tap Worldwide, LLC served on 12/21/2023, answer due 1/11/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System - Jaqueline Mejia (Authorized Agent for Service of Process) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Oaks Auto Center, LLC, Tap Worldwide, LLC. (et) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Juan Valencia. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Juan Valencia. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-36535530 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Juan Valencia(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.