Shahshwan L. Williams v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Shahshawn L. Williams |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2023cv10302 |
| December 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Geralyn A Gulseth added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Gulseth, Geralyn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Shahshawn L. Williams. (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Shahshawn L. Williams, (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shahshawn L. Williams. (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Shahshawn L. Williams. (Attorney Sima G Aghai added to party Shahshawn L. Williams(pty:pla))(Aghai, Sima) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
