SK Microworks America Inc. v. Far Eastern New Century Corporation et al
| SK Microworks America, Inc. and SK Microworks America Inc. |
| Far Eastern New Century Corporation, Multi-Plastics, Inc. and Multi Plastics Inc. |
| 2:2023cv10322 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jonathan W Hallman counsel for Plaintiff SK Microworks America Inc.. Adding Jonathan W. Hallman as counsel of record for SK Microworks America, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America, Inc.. (Attorney Jonathan W Hallman added to party SK Microworks America Inc. (pty:pla))(Hallman, Jonathan) |
Filing 13
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 12 First Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America Inc., (Parker, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Multi Plastics Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Far Eastern New Century Corporation. (sh) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (sh) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by SK Microworks America, Inc.. (Parker, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America, Inc., (Parker, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America, Inc.. (Parker, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America, Inc.. (Parker, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America, Inc.. (Parker, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-36541617 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff SK Microworks America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14) (Attorney Kenneth G. Parker added to party SK Microworks America, Inc.(pty:pla))(Parker, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
