Golden Bull LLC v. Oxford Gold Group, Inc.
Golden Bull LLC and Golden Bull, LLC |
Oxford Gold Group, Inc. and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2023cv10329 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Douglas F McCormick |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for March 18, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. This action has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Percy Anderson. (See document for further details). (aco) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Oxford Gold Group, Inc..(Vanzura, Glenn) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Vanzura, Glenn) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Oxford Gold Group, Inc. answer now due 1/31/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Oxford Gold Group, Inc..(Attorney Glenn K Vanzura added to party Oxford Gold Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Vanzura, Glenn) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Golden Bull, LLC, upon Defendant Oxford Gold Group, Inc. served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bristie Briggs, authorized agent for service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Prince, David) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Oxford Gold Group, Inc. (rolm) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Golden Bull, LLC. (Prince, David) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 9 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Golden Bull, LLC. (Prince, David) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Golden Bull LLC. (Prince, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Golden Bull LLC, (Prince, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36543697 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Golden Bull LLC. (Attorney David L Prince added to party Golden Bull LLC(pty:pla))(Prince, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.