Jose Jara Jara et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
| Jose Jara Jara and Eduardo Jara |
| Nissan North America, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv10461 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract - Insurance |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED, the scheduling conference set for February 5, 2024 is VACATED. The Court is ordering the parties to file the proper court form so they can consent to proceed before a MJ. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Eduardo Jara, Jose Jara Jara.. (Amarkarian, Allen) |
Filing 8
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for February 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Courts Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint Filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., on 11/1/2023, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Jose Jara Jara and Eduardo Jara in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/20/2023, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., identifying Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Corporate Parent; Jose Jara Jara, Plaintiff; Eduardo Jara, Plaintiff. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Los Angeles, case number 23PSCV01823 Receipt No: ACACDC-36572244 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Counsel, #2 Exhibit 1, Plfs' Complaint and related docs filed in State Court, #3 Exhibit 2, Defs' Answer filed in State Court, #4 Exhibit 3, Plfs' Case Statement filed in State Court) (Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Nissan North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Harlow, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
