Nike, Inc. v. Nicholas C. Tuinenburg et al
| Nike, Inc. |
| Nicholas C. Tuinenburg and Divide the Youth Manufacturing |
| 2:2023cv10495 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Alka Sagar |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 4/19/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Jared P. Greenfield to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc., designating Oscar M. Orozco-Botello as local counsel #17 . (gk)
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Tamar Y. Duvdevani to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc., designating Oscar M. Orozco-Botello as local counsel #16 . (gk)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
| Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Divide the Youth Manufacturing, Nicholas C. Tuinenburg.(Paris, Louise Jillian) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Amendment (Motion related) #20 and #21 . Correct event is: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests.. Application.. Appear Pro Hac Vice. Wrong event does not provide relief or changes sought. (lt) |
| Filing 22 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Nicholas C. Tuinenburg.(Attorney Louise Jillian Paris added to party Nicholas C. Tuinenburg(pty:dft))(Paris, Louise Jillian) |
| Filing 21 Amendment to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jared P. Greenfield to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36616581) #17 filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 20 Amendment to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tamar Y. Duvdevani to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36616524) #16 filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tamar Y. Duvdevani to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36616524) #16 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jared P. Greenfield to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36616581) #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. (sbou) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc., upon Defendant Divide the Youth Manufacturing served on 12/18/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lorena Tuinenburg, mother of agent Nicholas Tuinenburg in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jared P. Greenfield to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36616581) filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tamar Y. Duvdevani to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36616524) filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Tamar Y. Duvdevani. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jared Greenfield. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nicholas C. Tuinenburg. (car) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Divide the Youth Manufacturing. (car) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PLAINTIFF NIKE, INC.S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND AMENDED CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1; L.R. 7.1-1) filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Nike, Inc.. (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc., (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36578766 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attorney Oscar M Orozco-Botello added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:pla))(Orozco-Botello, Oscar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
