Fang Wang v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Fang Wang |
| Ur M. Jaddou, John Daly, Jr. and Corina Luna |
| 2:2023cv10498 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants John Daly, Jr., Ur M. Jaddou, Corina Luna. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff FANG WANG, (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff FANG WANG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff FANG WANG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36579346 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff FANG WANG. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party FANG WANG(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
