Lorenzo Contreras v. Araceli Morales et al
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Contreras
Defendant: Araceli Morales and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 2:2023cv10509
Filed: December 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Filing 9 Receipt of Remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court, Lancaster on 1/9/2024. (lc)
December 20, 2023 Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court.Lancaster, No.23AVUD01449. (lc)
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : Case is remanded to Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, 42011 4th Street West, Lancaster, California, 93534, Case No. 23AVUD01449. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.. Defendant's Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs is DENIED as MOOT #3 .(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
December 19, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
December 19, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
December 19, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et)
December 15, 2023 Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (SHORT FORM) filed by Defendant Araceli Morales. (et)
December 15, 2023 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Araceli Morales. (et)
December 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles, case number 23AVUD01449 with CONFORMED E-FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick., filed by Defendant Araceli Morales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et)
December 15, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER-UNLAWFUL DETAINER #1 filed by Defendant Araceli Morales. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/20/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lorenzo Contreras v. Araceli Morales et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Contreras
Represented By: William Garrett Cothran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Araceli Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?