Ana Ventura v. Quang Ky Ngo et al
Plaintiff: Ana Ventura
Defendant: Quang Ky Ngo doing business as Artistic Nails Spa, Peggy M. Allison and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 2:2023cv10575
Filed: December 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sherilyn Peace Garnett
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by PLAINTIFF Ana Ventura. (Kim, Jason)
February 9, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Ana Ventura. (Kim, Jason)
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: On January 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed Notice of Settlement at (Dkt. No. 12). The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for February 14, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. If the parties file a dismissal by February 9, 2024, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance by counsel will be required. All pending dates are vacated. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 11, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Ana Ventura. (Kim, Jason)
December 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause within fourteen (14) days of this order. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in either the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c). (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
December 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Failure to comply with any of the requirements set forth in this Order will result in dismissal of Plaintiff's claims as to the Defendant that is the subject of the required proof of service, request for default, or motion for default judgment and/or the action in its entirety. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
December 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to United States District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Both the Court and all counsel bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in this Court. "Counsel," as used in this Order, includes attorneys and parties who have elected to appear without an attorney and are representing themselves in this civil litigation (hereinafter referred to as "Pro Se Litigants"). (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
December 20, 2023 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Peggy M. Allison, Quang Ky Ngo. (car)
December 20, 2023 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
December 20, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
December 20, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car)
December 18, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Ana Ventura. (Kim, Jason)
December 18, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason)
December 18, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ana Ventura. (Kim, Jason)
December 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36592857 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Ana Ventura(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ana Ventura v. Quang Ky Ngo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ana Ventura
Represented By: Jason J. Kim
Represented By: Jason T. Yoon
Represented By: Kevin Hyunjong Hong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quang Ky Ngo doing business as Artistic Nails Spa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peggy M. Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?