Silva Kalpakyan et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al
| Silva Kalpakyan and Karo Kalpakyan |
| Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc. and Does 1 through 30, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv10585 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Alka Sagar |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to March 14, 2024 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gallagher, Mehgan) |
Filing 11
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC AND SONIC SANTA MONICA M, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: For reasons stated in the Stipulation #10 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc.'s deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to 2/15/2024. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 02/15/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gallagher, Mehgan) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kd)
|
| Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc. answer now due 1/25/2024; Mercedes-Benz USA LLC answer now due 1/25/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc.; Mercedes-Benz USA LLC.(Gallagher, Mehgan) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 30, inclusive, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Silva Kalpakyan, Karo Kalpakyan. Filed in State Court on 11/14/2023 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc., identifying Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz Group, Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation, Corporate Parent Daimler International Nederland B.V. for Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC identifying Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz Group, Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation, Corporate Parent Daimler International Nederland B.V. for Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23SMCV05372 Receipt No: ACACDC-36594123 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc., Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Sonic Santa Monica M., Inc.(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
