Bald Creative LLC v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
BALD CREATIONS LLC and Bald Creative LLC |
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
2:2023cv10588 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Percy Anderson. APPLICATION of Attorney Michael E. Piston to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bald Creative LLC, designating Arthur Minas as local counsel GRANTED.; granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Michael E. Piston. (aco) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael E. Piston to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bald Creative LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36750487) filed by Plaintiff Bald Creative LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Minas, Arthur) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bald Creative LLC, (Minas, Arthur) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) |
Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Attorney General. (sh) |
Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Attorneys Office Central District of California (sh) |
Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (sh) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (sh) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Summons Request #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff BALD CREATIONS LLC. (Minas, Arthur) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff BALD CREATIONS LLC. (Minas, Arthur) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff BALD CREATIONS LLC. (Minas, Arthur) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BALD CREATIONS LLC. (Minas, Arthur) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36594420 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff BALD CREATIONS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Arthur Minas added to party BALD CREATIONS LLC(pty:pla))(Minas, Arthur) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.