Ella Netes v. CHA Hollywood Medical Center, L.P.
| Ella Netes |
| CHA Hollywood Medical Center, L.P. doing business as CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center |
| 2:2023cv10630 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John A Kronstadt |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER RE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION #10 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Therefore, the Request is GRANTED, as follows: The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint is extended to March 8, 2024. There will be no further continunances absent a showing of compelling circumstances that could not reasonably have been anticipated. (rolm)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION filed by Plaintiff Ella Netes. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (yl) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: POSTPONING RULING on #8 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint. See the attached statement of details. (yl)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ella Netes. (yl) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: POSTPONING Ruling on the #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must file an Amended Complaint. See the attached statement for details) (yl)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Ella Netes. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ella Netes. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant CHA Hollywood Medical Center, L.P. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim., filed by plaintiff Ella Netes. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ella Netes v. CHA Hollywood Medical Center, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ella Netes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHA Hollywood Medical Center, L.P. doing business as CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
