Michael Harrison v. B. Birkholz
| Michael Harrison |
| B. Birkholz |
| 2:2023cv10637 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani and Lodging of Proposed Judgment and Order. Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2024 (dc) |
Filing 7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO DENY THE PETITION, DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE, AND DENY THE REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (dc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction or Stay filed by Petitioner Michael Harrison. (hr) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #4 filed by Petitioner Michael Harrison (hr) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order To Show Cause Why Case Should Not BeDismissedby Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: As such, Petitioner is ordered to show cause by February 12, 2024, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner may satisfy this order to show cause by explaining how his claim qualifies as an actual innocence claim and how he did not have an unobstructed procedural shot to pursue this claim. If Petitioner does not respond to this OSC, or cannot satisfactorily explain how he qualifies for the escape hatch, the Court must dismiss this 2241 petition (dc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (sh) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by Petitioner Michael Harrison. (sh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE PAID), filed by Petitioner Michael Harrison. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael Harrison v. B. Birkholz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Harrison | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: B. Birkholz | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
