Jacqueline Nguyen v. Spirit Airlines Inc. et al
| Jacqueline Nguyen |
| Spirit Airlines, Inc., Spirit Airlines Inc. and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2023cv10676 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. Jury Trial set for 2/18/2025 at 9:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See order for dates, deadlines and requirements imposed.* (vdr)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines Inc... (Pardasani, Natasha) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 2/8/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines Inc..[FILED IN STATE COURT 11/02/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBIT C TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Spirit Airlines Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Nguyen.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/16/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 12/21/2023. (Lazenby, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines, Inc., identifying Interested Party: Various underwriters in the aviation insurance market. (Lazenby, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines, Inc. identifying no parent corporation as Corporate Parent. (Lazenby, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines, Inc.. (Lazenby, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV19630 Receipt No: ACACDC-36615066 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Spirit Airlines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A_Complaint, #2 Exhibit B_POS of Summons, #3 Exhibit C_Answer, #4 Exhibit D_Req for Stmt of Damages, #5 Exhibit E_Stmt of Damages) (Attorney Richard A. Lazenby added to party Spirit Airlines, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lazenby, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
