Danny Martinez v. TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc.
DANNY MARTINEZ |
TRANSUNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC. and TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc. |
2:2023cv10678 |
December 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
George H Wu |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for March 21, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than March 14, 2024. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc..(O'Neil, Michael) |
Filing 18 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H Wu. APPLICATION of Attorney Albert E. Hartmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc., designating Brian P. Cadigan as local counsel GRANTED.; granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Albert E. Hartmann. (aco) |
Filing 17 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H Wu. APPLICATION of Attorney Michael O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc., designating Brian P. Cadigan as local counsel GRANTED.; granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Michael O'Neil. (aco) |
Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Albert E. Hartmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36766453) filed by Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cadigan, Brian) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36766223) filed by Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cadigan, Brian) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc. answer now due 2/15/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc..(Cadigan, Brian) |
Filing 12 Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc., identifying Trans Union LLC; TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.; and TransUnion. (Cadigan, Brian) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Brian Patrick Cadigan on behalf of Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc. (Attorney Brian Patrick Cadigan added to party TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc.(pty:dft))(Cadigan, Brian) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Danny Martinez, upon Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc. served on 12/28/2023, answer due 1/18/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Curtis Miranda, Security/person authorized to accept service on behalf of TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc. in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions Inc.. (sh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DANNY MARTINEZ, identifying None.. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DANNY MARTINEZ. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DANNY MARTINEZ. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36615473 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff DANNY MARTINEZ. (Attorney Yitzchak Zelman added to party DANNY MARTINEZ(pty:pla))(Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.