Claude Fiset et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Claude Fiset and MEDIX3D LLC |
| JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 25 |
| 2:2023cv10735 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Steve Kim |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Notice of Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Claude Fiset. (Tran, Cali) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer now due 2/16/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Nylen, Gregory) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Medix3D LLC. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Tran, Cali) |
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Sylvia Simson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., designating Gregory Nylen as local counsel #15 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Ryan Sirianni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., designating Gregory Nylen as local counsel #14 . (iv)
|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Sylvia E. Simson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36665577) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nylen, Gregory) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ryan Sirianni to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36662048) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nylen, Gregory) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER FOR NEWLY ASSIGNED CIVIL CASES by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to United States District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Both the Court and all counsel bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in this Court. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER TAKING OFF CALENDAR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT #11 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The Court, having considered the Parties Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, hereby ORDERS as follows: Chase's Ex Parte Application For An Extension Of Time To Respond To The Complaint, scheduled for January 3, 2024, is hereby withdrawn; AND Chase shall respond to the Complaint by January 17, 2024 as agreed in the Stipulation. (rolm)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Withdraw Motion EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 1/17/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery) #8 , STIPULATION for Order CONFIRMING JANUARY 17, 2024 RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nylen, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 served on December 27, 2023. (Santos, Rowena) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 1/17/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery) #8 served on December 27, 2023. (Santos, Rowena) |
| Filing 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 1/17/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rowena Santos, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order) (Santos, Rowena) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 25, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Medix3D LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Claude Fiset. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/22/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on December 22, 2023. (Santos, Rowena) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,, (Santos, Rowena) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,. (Santos, Rowena) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23STCV28678 Receipt No: ACACDC-36624130 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Rowena G Santos added to party JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,(pty:dft))(Santos, Rowena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
