Nereyda Valladares Perez v. Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff: NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Case Number: 2:2023cv10751
Filed: December 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
January 10, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV23-10751 PVC on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
January 9, 2024 Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
December 29, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Nereyda Valladares Perez. (Ver Planck, Mark)
December 28, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil)
December 26, 2023 Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ. (Ver Planck, Mark)
December 26, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ, (Ver Planck, Mark)
December 26, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ. (Ver Planck, Mark)
December 26, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ. (Attachments: #1 Fee Agreement - Federal Court) (Attorney Mark Ver Planck added to party NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ(pty:pla))(Ver Planck, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nereyda Valladares Perez v. Martin O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NEREYDA VALLADARES PEREZ
Represented By: Mark Ver Planck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Michael K Marriott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?