Yipu Wang v. David M. Radel
| Yipu Wang |
| David M. Radel |
| 2:2023cv10757 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO STAY (ECF No. #10 ) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The stipulation is granted #10 . The action is stayed until June 11, 2025, or until USCIS adjudicates Plaintiffs petition, whichever is earlier. By June 11, 2025, the parties shall file a joint status report updating the Court with the status of the petition and addressing whether the stay should be extended. Additionally, the parties shall file a joint status report within seven days of any final decision on the petition. (lom)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending adjudication of Plaintiff's application filed by Defendants David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Christopher B. Buchanan added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Buchanan, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yipu Wang, upon Defendant David M. Radel served on 12/27/2023, answer due 2/26/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.. Registered or certified mail postage paid receipts only attached as to Attorney General of US Department of Justice, Civil Process Clerk, and David N. Radel attached, No return receipt executed are attached. (lc) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (sh) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant David M. Radel. (sh) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yipu Wang, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants David M. Radel. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner.(Filing fee $ 405 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiff Yipu Wang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yipu Wang v. David M. Radel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yipu Wang | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David M. Radel | |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Buchanan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
