Vem Yenovkian v. JP Morgan Chase and Co
Plaintiff: Vem Yenovkian
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase and Co
Case Number: 2:2023cv10762
Filed: December 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 21-Day Summons Issued re Amended Complaint #10 as to Defendant JP Morgan Chase and Co. (gk)
February 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Because this Court appears to have subject-matter jurisdiction, the Court turns to Plaintiff's Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP"). Plaintiff declares that he has no income and only $200 in his bank account. Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause #9 and GRANTS Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP #3 . (gk)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant JP Morgan Chase and Co; amending Complaint #1 ; with Jury Demand filed by Plaintiff Vem Yenovkian. (gk)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, by no later than 1/24/2024, why the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case by demonstrating that the amount in controversy is more than $75,000. For each category of claimed damages, Plaintiff shall (1) explain how the claimed damages relate to a cause of action in the complaint and (2) provide factual support for the claimed damages. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in dismissal without prejudice. The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff's IFP request #3 until it is satisfied that it has subject-matter jurisdiction. (gk)
January 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED ("PRO SE")LITIGANT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, you are nonetheless required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on this Court's website. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Civil standing upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Vem Yenovkian. (sh)
December 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vem Yenovkian, (sh)
December 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant JP Morgan Chase and Co.Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. filed by Plaintiff Vem Yenovkian. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vem Yenovkian v. JP Morgan Chase and Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vem Yenovkian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase and Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?