Janette Ocegueda et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
Janette Ocegueda, Juan A. Ocegueda Jr. and Janette Castro |
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation, American Honda Motor Company, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2023cv10870 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Patricia Donahue |
Steve Kim |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 4/5/2024 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Answer filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. American Honda Motor Company, Inc..(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-10870 FLA(SKx). (rn) |
Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Janette Ocegueda. (LaRocque, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elizabeth A LaRocque counsel for Plaintiff Janette Ocegueda. Adding Elizabeth Larocque as counsel of record for Janette Castro Ocegueda for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Janette Castro Ocegueda. (Attorney Elizabeth A LaRocque added to party Janette Ocegueda(pty:pla))(LaRocque, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Juan A. Ocegueda Jr., Janette Ocegueda. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/21/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation identifying Honda Motor Company, Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation, identifying Honda Motor Company, Ltd.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation identifying Honda Motor Company, Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23TRCV03896] Receipt No: ACACDC-36645736 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A_Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B_The Kelley Blue Book Auction Value) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.