Shahrooz Arianpour v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
Shahrooz Arianpour |
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Terry York Motor Cars.Ltd. also known as Land Rover Woodland Hills doing business as Land Rover Encino, Land Rover Woodland Hills and Does 1 to 50, Inclusive |
2:2023cv10873 |
December 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Alka Sagar |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/21/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2024 at 03:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR NEWLY ASSIGNED CIVIL CASES by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett.READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (iv) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-10873 SPG(ASx). (rn) |
Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Shahrooz Arianpour. (Moghtader, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Does 1 to 50, Inclusive, Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Terry York Motor Cars.Ltd. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/27/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2)(ghap) Modified on 1/3/2024 (ghap). |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 50, Inclusive, Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Terry York Motor Cars.Ltd. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Shahrooz Arianpour. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2) (ghap) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Notice (Other) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 12/29/23. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Notice of re-filing state court answer filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC identifying Jaguar Land Rover Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Holdings Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC, which is a subsidiary of TML Holdings Pte. Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Tata Motors Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23VECV04372 Receipt No: ACACDC-36646437 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Matthew C. Wolf added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Wolf, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.