Maksym Tokarev v. PHH Mortgage Services et al
| MAKSYM TOKAREV |
| PHH Mortgage Services and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv10883 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, PHH Mortgage Services amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Maksym Tokarev(Shapero, Sarah) |
Filing 14
DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT FOR LACK OF GOOD CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Request to Appear Remotely #13 . (jp)
|
| Filing 13 Notice of Request for Remote Appearance filed by Plaintiff Maksym Tokarev. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shapero, Sarah) |
| Filing 12 Notice of intent to file Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Maksym Tokarev. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Service)(Shapero, Sarah) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/11/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 3/18/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Services. (Attachments: #1 EX 1 - Deed of Trust, #2 EX 2 - Notice of Default, #3 EX 3 - First Notice of Trustee's Sale, #4 EX 4 - Second Notice of Trustee's Sale, #5 EX 5 - First BK Petition, #6 EX 6 - Second BK Petition, #7 EX 7 - Dismissal of Second BK, #8 EX 8 - Third BK Petition, #9 EX 9 - Third BK Ch. 13 Plan, #10 EX 10 - Trustee's MTD Third BK, #11 EX 11 - Opp re Trustee's MTD, #12 EX 12 - Order Granting MFR, #13 EX 13 - Dismissal of Third BK)(Norman, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant PHH Mortgage Services. Motion set for hearing on 3/4/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Norman, Robert) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to PHH Mortgage Services answer now due 2/2/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Services.(Coronado King, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, inclusive, PHH Mortgage Services. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Maksym Tokarev. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/28/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of 11) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Services, (Norman, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Services. (Norman, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 3BBCV02812 Receipt No: ACACDC-36647746 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1" - Complaint) (Attorney Robert W Norman, Jr added to party PHH Mortgage Services(pty:dft))(Norman, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
