Dania Andazola v. Kaiser Permanente et al
Dania Andazola |
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center aka Southern California Permanente Medical Group, aka Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Permanente Group, Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Southern California Permanente Medical Group |
2:2023cv10904 |
December 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form, #17 , Amended Complaint/Petition #14 filed by PLAINTIFF Dania Andazola. (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Deficiency in Filed Documents (G-112A) #16 , Summons Request #15 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The document is stricken. Plaintiff is directed to re-file a "Request for Summons" that cures the deficiencies listed on the "Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Filed Document"(Docket No. 16). (hr) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Summons Request #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: 1.) Lacking defendant's name & address. 2.) Lacking plaintiff's attorney name & address. 3.) Filer shall refrain from dating the summons. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 15 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #17 *** Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #14 filed by PLAINTIFF Dania Andazola. (Peffer, Michael) Modified on 2/27/2024 (hr). |
Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT Southern California Permanente Medical Group amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by PLAINTIFF Dania Andazola(Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael J Peffer counsel for Plaintiff Dania Andazola. Adding Katherine Hartley as counsel of record for DANIA ANDAZOLA for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by PLAINTIFF DANIA ANDAZOLA. (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 12 STATUS REPORT on Motion for Transfer of Actions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings filed by Defendant Southern California Permanente Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Status Update on Motion for Transfer of Actions)(Strauss, Sean) |
Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
Filing 10 Notice Notice of Filing of Notice of Related Actions in MDL 3095 filed by Defendant Southern California Permanente Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Notice of Related Actions in MDL-3095)(Strauss, Sean) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Permanente Group. (et) |
Filing 8 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (et) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dania Andazola. (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Dania Andazola, identifying Kaiser Permanente. (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dania Andazola. (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dania Andazola. (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36649468 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Dania Andazola. (Attorney Michael J Peffer added to party Dania Andazola(pty:pla))(Peffer, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.