Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Marcus Todd Brisco et al
| Commodity Futures Trading Commission |
| Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, Yas Castellum LLC, Yas Castellum Financial LLC, Tin Quoc Tran, Francisco Story, Ted Safranko, Saeg Capital General Management LP and Michael Shannon Sims |
| 2:2023mc00018 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Kelly M Crawford. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. (sh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER Re: 4:23-cv-000336 from Southern District of Texas., filed by Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission. FEE PAID. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
