Adam Struck, et al., v. Yida Gao, et al.,
| Adam Struck, Struck Capital and Struck Capital Management LLC |
| Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC and Shima Capital Management LLC |
| 2:2023mc00029 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, re MISC - MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER #1 . (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (et)
|
| Filing 6 Text Only Entry by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order, filed February 15, 2023 (ECF No. #1 ), and transferred from the Eastern District of California on February 23, 2023 (ECF No. #3 ), is duplicative of part of the Motion for Protective Order pending in Struck v. Gao, 2:22-cv-02415-SPG-MAA ("Original Case"), the matter from which the at-issue subpoenas was issued. Because the Motion for Protective Order in the Original Case is fully briefed, the Court will rule on the Motion for Protective Order here as part of its order on the Motion for Protective Order in the Original Case. Accordingly, no further briefing is necessary and Plaintiffs need not file an opposition to the Motion for Protective Order here. The matter is deemed submitted at this time and Court will set a hearing on the Motion for Protective Order if necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (nne) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/23/2023 GRANTING #2 Unopposed Motion to Transfer and CASE TRANSFERRED to Central District of CA. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/27/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 UNOPPOSED MOTION to TRANSFER #1 Motion for Protective Order to Central District by Yida Gao, et al., (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dilan A. Esper, #2 Exhibit 1 - December 2, 2022 Order, #3 Proposed Order)(Stonerock, Ryan) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/27/2023.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER by Yida Gao, et al., Attorney Stonerock, Ryan added. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dilan A. Esper, #2 Exhibit 1 Subpoenas at issue, #3 Exhibit 2 Complaint filed by Yida Gao, #4 Exhibit 3 Struck Motion to Compel, #5 Exhibit 4 Order, #6 Exhibit 5 Gao Arbitration Demand, #7 Exhibit 6 Struck First Amended Counterclaim, #8 Exhibit 7 Struck Requests for Discovery, #9 Exhibit 8 Objections to Discovery, #10 Exhibit 9 Arbitrator Order No. 1, #11 Exhibit 10 Arbitrator Order No. 5, #12 Declaration of Yida Gao, #13 Exhibit 1 Veradittakit Declaration, #14 Exhibit 2 Email Exchange between Mr. Struck and Paul Veradittakit, #15 Proposed Order)(Stonerock, Ryan) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/27/2023.] |
| PAYMENT for miscellaneous case filing fee in the amount of $ 49, receipt number ACAEDC-10699651. (Stonerock, Ryan) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/27/2023.] |
| NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Motion for Protective Order. (Licea Chavez, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/27/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
