U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thida Trimming, Inc.
| U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Thida Trimming, Inc. |
| 2:2023mc00039 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, re Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #6 served on 05/05/2023. (Li, Derek) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, re Order to Show Cause,, #5 served on April 21, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Li, Derek) |
Filing 5
ORDER RE: EEOC'S APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ITS SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED AS REVISED BY COURT by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. It is hereby ORDERED that Respondent appear on July 5, 2023 at 10:00am. in Courtroom 9, United States Courthouse 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA. 90012, and show cause why it should not be be compelled to comply with the Subpoena. IT FURTHER that the Commission shall serve the Respondent with a copy of this Order to Show Cause, along with the Commission's Application, on or before May 5, 2023. [See document for details.] (et)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Li, Derek) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Order re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Li, Derek) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Order to Show Cause Why Its Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Petitioner U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, #2 Declaration of EEOC Attorney Derek Li, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11) (Attorney Derek W Li added to party U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(pty:pet))(Li, Derek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thida Trimming, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Derek W Li |
| Represented By: | Anna Y. Park |
| Represented By: | Nakkisa Akhavan |
| Represented By: | Taylor M. Markey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Thida Trimming, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
