In Re DMCA 512(h) Subpoena to X Corp.
X Corp. and Genevieve Morton |
DMCA 512(h) Subpoena to X Corp. |
2:2023mc00060 |
April 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE issued to X Corp. was served upon Ana Gomez, Intake Specialist on April 17, 2023 by Personal service. RE: Subpoena (AO 88) Issued #5 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration Re: POS)(Holliday, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Petitioner Genevieve Morton. Acknowledgment of Receipt of DMCA Reports as to MISC - Subpoena to Identify Infringer (DMCA) #1 . (Holliday, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE issued as to X Corp., Custodian of Records. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Petitioner Genevieve Morton. correcting Subpoena Request (AO 88) #2 (Holliday, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Petitioner Genevieve Morton. (Holliday, Jennifer) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Petitioner Genevieve Morton. (Holliday, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT SUBPOENA Receipt No: ACACDC-35121991 - Fee: $49, filed by Petitioner Genevieve Morton. (Attorney Jennifer Holliday added to party Genevieve Morton(pty:pet))(Holliday, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.