Michael Stewart v. Wedding Grid LLC
Michael Stewart |
Wedding Grid LLC |
2:2024cv00006 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D Pregerson |
Karen L Stevenson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central Districts website at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov for Judge Dean D.Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing a motion. Counsel are required to comply with C.D. Cal. L.R. 5-4.4.1 through 5-4.4.2. (shb) |
Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-00006-DDP-KSx. (aco) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Wedding Grid LLC. (car) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (car) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Stewart, identifying SANDERS LAW GROUP, Craig Sanders, Wedding Grid LLC. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Michael Stewart. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Michael Stewart. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Stewart. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36650410 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Michael Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of Photograph) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Michael Stewart(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michael Stewart v. Wedding Grid LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Stewart | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wedding Grid LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.