Martray Reese v. Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc.
| Martray Reese |
| Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv00050 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Martray Reese, Defendant Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc., Daikin Comfort Technologies North America, Inc., Goodman Global Holdings, Inc.. (Ebsworth, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc.. (Ebsworth, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV29162 Receipt No: ACACDC-36663813 - Fee: $405, filed by defendant Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, etc., #2 Exhibit B - Answer) (Attorney Phillip James Ebsworth added to party Daikin Comfort Technologies Distribution, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ebsworth, Phillip)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
