Cynthia Block v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. et al
| Cynthia Block |
| Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2024cv00059 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Monica Ramirez Almadani |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#24-021) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani, this case is transferred from Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to the calendar of Monica Ramirez Almadani for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-00059 MRA(MARx). (cbr)
|
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert J King counsel for Plaintiff Cynthia Block. Adding Rachael E. Sauer as counsel of record for Plaintiff Cynthia Block for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Block. (King, Robert) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert J King on behalf of Plaintiff Cynthia Block (King, Robert) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 12
PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: PLEASE READ THIS ORDER (AND ATTACHMENT) CAREFULLY: The post-settlement status conference is set for September 13, 2024, at 8:30 AM. The pretrial conference is set for October 11, 2024, at 10:00 AM. The jury trial is set for October 21, 2024, at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DATES AND DEADLINES. (jgr)
|
| Filing 10 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court heard from the parties about the status of the case and issues bearing on scheduling. A case management order will be issued separately. The parties are ordered to exchange initial disclosures no later than February 9, 2024. As discussed on the record, the parties shall meet and confer to confirm whether they consent to the referral of this case to a magistrate judge for all purposes. If they agree to consent, they shall first contact the courtroom deputy of the desired magistrate judge on the Voluntary Consent List to confirm availability and then attach Form CV-11D (Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) to a Notice of Lodging of Consent Form, which shall be e-filed as required by Local Rule 5-4.4 as a proposed document. No later than February 16, 2024, the parties shall file either their consent form or a joint report on the status of their discussions. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (jgr) |
| Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Scheduling Conference Statement ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc... (Brenner, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on February 2, 2024 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by January 23, 2024. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 7
Civil standing order upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Block. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/30/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc., (Brenner, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc.. (Brenner, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County, case number 23STCV29215 Receipt No: ACACDC-36665730 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendants Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Scott M. Brady, #2 Exhibit Summons & Complaint) (Attorney Jonathan M Brenner added to party Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan M Brenner added to party Quest Diagnostics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Brenner, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
