Jardine Gougis v. Maria E. Sanchez et al
| Jardine Gougis |
| Maria E. Sanchez doing business as Sanchez Beauty Salon, Maria E. Sanchez as Trustee of The Maria E. Sanchez Revocable Living Trust doing business as Sanchez Beauty Salon and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv00127 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT #18 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The default entered against Defendant Maria E. Sanchez is SET ASIDE. Defendant may file responsive pleadings within 30 days of this order. (lc)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to Defendant Maria E. Sanchez filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 17 (SET ASIDE PER 2/29/2024 ORDER DOCKET NO. 19). DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Maria E. Sanchez as Trustee of The Maria E. Sanchez Revocable Living Trust doing business as Sanchez Beauty Salon (lc) Modified on 2/29/2024 (lc). |
| Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Maria E. Sanchez filed by plaintiff Jardine Gougis. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougisto Order to Show Cause #12 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis, upon Defendant Maria E. Sanchez served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maria E. Sanchez - Trustee, defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 13 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/23/2024. (tf)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maria E. Sanchez. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Jardine Gougis. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jardine Gougis. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36678769 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Jardine Gougis(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
