Yunying Liu v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Yunying Liu |
| Ur M. Jaddou, John Daly, Jr. and Lory C. Torres |
| 2:2024cv00152 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (hc) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants John Daly, Jr., Ur M. Jaddou and Lory C. Torres. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Yunying Liu, (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yunying Liu. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Lory C. Torres. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36683045 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Lory C. Torres. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party Lory C. Torres(pty:dft))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
