Yan Zhou v. David M. Radel
| Yan Zhou |
| David M. Radel |
| 2:2024cv00173 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Hernan D Vera |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yan Zhou, upon Defendant David M Radel, Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon David M Radel by certified mail to David M Radel, Director of Asylum Office in Los Angeles. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (lom) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yan Zhou, upon Defendant David M Radel; by certified mail of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office - Civil Process Clerk on 1/8/24. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (lom) Modified on 1/18/2024 (lom). |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yan Zhou, upon Defendant David M. Radel served on 1/8/2024, answer due 3/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General Office - by certified mail to N/A. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (lom) Modified on 1/18/2024 (lom). Modified on 1/18/2024 (lom). |
Filing 6
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (wm)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yan Zhou. (et) |
| Filing 2 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant David M. Radel. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS IMMIGRATION CASE against Defendant David M. Radel. Case assigned to Judge Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Filing fee $ 405 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Yan Zhou. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yan Zhou v. David M. Radel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yan Zhou | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David M. Radel | |
| Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
| Represented By: | Oil Appellate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
