FedEx Corporate Services Inc. v. Starship, LLC et al
| FedEx Corporate Services Inc. |
| Starship, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company dba Rockstar Original, Starship, LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Rockstar Original and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv00196 |
| January 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES PURSUANT TO FRCP 42 [ECF NO. 30 ] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Starship, LLC v. Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., United States District Court for the Central District of California., Case No. 2:23-CV-10059-MEMFAS and Fed Ex Corporate Services v. Starship, LLC., Case No. 2:24-CV-00196-SB-MARx are CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES. The new case number for all filings is 2:23- cv-10059- MEMF-JS. The Scheduling Conference set for March 28, 2024 in this case will proceed as scheduled. IT IS SO ORDERED Cases associated with Lead Case 2:23-CV-1005-MEMF-JS. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on March 22, 2024 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by March 12, 2024. See order for details. (jgr)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Starship, LLC.(Perry, Michael) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Starship, LLC, identifying Starship, LLC. (Perry, Michael) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Starship, LLC answer now due 2/21/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Starship, LLC.(Attorney Michael J Perry added to party Starship, LLC(pty:dft))(Perry, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
Civil standing order upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Starship, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
| Filing 5 Amended CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff FedEx Corporate Services Inc., identifying Federal Express Corporation. (Bui, Long) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff FedEx Corporate Services Inc., (Bui, Long) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff FedEx Corporate Services Inc.. (Bui, Long) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff FedEx Corporate Services Inc.. (Bui, Long) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36694626 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff FedEx Corporate Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A & B) (Attorney Long K Bui added to party FedEx Corporate Services Inc.(pty:pla))(Bui, Long) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
