Maria Aguirre v. Amazon Services LLC et al
| Maria Aguirre |
| Amazon Services LLC, Sunbeam Products Inc. and Does 1 to 50 inclusive |
| 2:2024cv00218 |
| January 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal- Remand to Superior Court (rolm) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court at Norwalk. Case number: 23NWCV03970. (jp) |
Filing 10
MNUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING Action to State Court by Judge Josephine L. Staton: This action is REMANDED to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No.23NWCV03970. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES by Judge Josephine L. Staton. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Amazon Services LLCto Order to Show Cause, #7 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew Brady, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(McNulty, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Remanded to State Court by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Defendants are ORDERED to show cause, in writing (no longer than five (5) pages), within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, why the Court should not remand this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to timely respond will result in the immediate remand of the action. (jp)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Amazon Services LLC, Does, Sunbeam Products Inc., filed by Plaintiff Maria Aguirre. [FILED IN STATE COURT 12/08/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Amazon Services LLC.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Sunbeam Products Inc.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.. (McNulty, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., identifying Amazon Services, LLC and Sunbeam Products, Inc.. (McNulty, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23NWCV03970 Receipt No: ACACDC-36699434 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Elizabeth V. McNulty added to party SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.(pty:dft))(McNulty, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
