Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd. v. Lausaint Industrial Co. Ltd. et al
| Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd. |
| Lausaint Industrial Co. Ltd., Ningbo Re Mode Network Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo Luosen Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Teak Source USA |
| 2:2024cv00331 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Case transferred from Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:24-cv-00331-JAK-MAAx. (aco)
|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Lausaint Industrial Co. Ltd., Ningbo Luosen Network Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo Re Mode Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Teak Source USA. (Attachments: #1 Ningbo Luosent, #2 Ningbo Re Mode, #3 Teak Source USA) (jtil) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd., (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Dilger, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36720849 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Nathaniel L Dilger added to party Zhejiang Zhengte Co. Ltd.(pty:pla))(Dilger, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
