Tonyette N. Devito Ortiz v. Martin J. O Malley
| Tonyette N. Devito Ortiz |
| Commissioner, Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J. O Malley |
| 2:2024cv00333 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin J. O Malley. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Martin J. O Malley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tonyette N. Devito Ortiz, identifying Social Security Administration. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tonyette N. Devito Ortiz. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (405.00 paid on 01/12/2024, receipt number ACACDC-36721645), filed by Plaintiff Tonyette N. Devito Ortiz. (Attorney Patricia L McCabe added to party Tonyette N. Devito Ortiz(pty:pla))(McCabe, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
