Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr. v. Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC
| Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr. |
| Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC |
| 2:2024cv00386 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PETITIONERS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Respondent Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Marsteller, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proof of Service) (Vanderwall, Cameron) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Cameron C. Vanderwall on behalf of respondent Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC. (Attorney Cameron Cortez Vanderwall added to party Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC (pty:res))(Vanderwall, Cameron) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. ORDER case transferred from Judge Fernando M. Olguin to the calendar of Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-00386 CAS(BFM). Signed by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (rn)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (FEDERAL CUSTODY) by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. Respondent's response to the Petition shall be filed NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 21, 2024. At the time the response is filed, Respondent shall lodge with the Court all records bearing on Respondent's response. Because Petitioner's release date is currently April 5, 2024, without the credit he alleges he is owed, no extensions of that deadline will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Petitioner shall file a response to Respondent's pleading as soon as practicable, but NO LATER THAN MARCH 22, 2024. At the time the opposition is filed, Petitioner shall lodge with the Court any records not lodged by Respondent that Petitioner believes may be relevant to the Court's determination of the motion. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, this case shall be deemed submitted on the day following the date Petitioner's response is due. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 blank consent form) (ch)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff.(Filing fee $ 5 PAID), filed by Petitioner Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr.. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
