La Drea Johnson v. County of Los Angeles et al
| La Drea Johnson |
| County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Victor Porcayo, Son Nguyen, Renee Morales, Renee Moreales and Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2024cv00475 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND #7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 7) is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. On or before April 7, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") that attempts to remedy the identified defects. (See document for details) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Dismissal, #2 Civil Rights Complaint Form) (vmun)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: 21 Day Summons Issued, #8 Docket entry #8, 21 Day Summons Issued re Amended Complaint, was issued in error. The First Amended Complaint requires screening before the summons can be issued. Disregard docket entry #8. (lro) |
| Filing 8 [SEE NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR, (9)] 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint, #7 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles, Renee Morales (Police Officer I, official capacity), Son Nguyen (Police Officer II, official capacity), Victor Porcayo (Sergeant I, official capacity). (Attachments: #1 Summons.2 City of Los Angeles, #2 Summons3.Son Nguyen, #3 Summons4.Renee Morales)(es) Modified on 3/6/2024 (lro). |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Renee Morales (Police Officer I, official capacity), Son Nguyen (Police Officer II, official capacity); Party Victor Porcayo (Sergeant I, official capacity) terminated amending Complaint - (Referred) #1 , filed by Plaintiff La Drea Johnson(es) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON PRISONER CASE) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (the "Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: is not able to pay the filing fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED. (shb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin, re Complaint - (Referred) #1 The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. On or before March 1, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") that attempts toremedy the identified defects. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 of 2, #2 Attachment 2 of 2) (es)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff La Drea Johnson. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff La Drea Johnson (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin, filed by Plaintiff La Drea Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
